AI tool comparison
Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform vs Make
Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.
AI Agents
Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
End-to-end workspace for building, governing, and scaling AI agents at enterprise
25%
Panel ship
—
Community
Paid
Entry
Announced at Google Cloud Next '26 on April 22, 2026, the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform is Google's full-stack play for enterprise AI agents. It combines Agent Studio (a low-code interface for building and testing agents using natural language), Agent Engine (managed deployment and scaling), and Agent Space (end-user portal for discovering and interacting with agents). The platform gives access to Gemini 3.1 Pro for complex reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image for visuals, Lyria 3 for audio, and — notably — Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 as an alternative model backbone. The platform is designed to address the full lifecycle: build, test, deploy, monitor, and govern. It integrates with Wiz's new AI Application Protection Platform for runtime security, and maps to the same EU AI Act compliance requirements that are driving enterprise urgency. Google also announced two new TPU generations: TPU 8t (optimized for training speed) and TPU 8i (inference, 80% better cost-efficiency vs prior gen), plus a $750 million fund to help cloud partners accelerate agentic AI adoption. For large organizations already on Google Cloud, this is a compelling consolidation. The model choice flexibility (including Claude) is a smart acknowledgment that enterprises don't want single-vendor lock-in. For indie developers and small teams, however, this is firmly enterprise software with enterprise complexity — pricing is GCP standard and the full platform setup has real overhead.
Automation
Make
Visual automation platform — like Zapier but more powerful
100%
Panel ship
—
Community
Free
Entry
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform with drag-and-drop workflow building. More powerful than Zapier for complex scenarios with branching, loops, and data transformation. 1,800+ app integrations.
Reviewer scorecard
“The low-code Agent Studio is genuinely well-designed for teams that don't want to manage infrastructure, but this is firmly GCP-native — you're locked into Google's deployment model. The multi-model support including Claude is nice, but I'd rather use an open framework I control.”
“More powerful than Zapier for complex workflows — branching, loops, error handling. The visual builder makes complex logic readable. Great for non-trivial automation.”
“This is Google's fifth major 'enterprise AI platform' in three years — Vertex AI, Duet AI, Gemini for Google Workspace, and now this. Enterprises are fatigued by rebrands. The $750M partner fund is marketing, not a technical differentiator. Come back in 12 months when the dust settles.”
“Steeper learning curve than Zapier but the ceiling is much higher. If your automation needs are simple, Zapier is easier. If they're complex, Make is better.”
“The TPU 8i delivering 80% cost improvement on inference is the real headline buried in the announcement. Cheaper inference at scale changes the ROI math for entire enterprise categories. Google is quietly building the most cost-efficient AI infrastructure on the planet.”
“Lyria 3 for professional audio and Gemini Flash Image for visual assets are genuinely useful, but they're buried inside enterprise procurement. Creative teams at agencies don't buy through GCP — they buy through app stores and Figma plugins. Wrong channel for the right capabilities.”
“I use Make for my content pipeline — new blog post triggers social media scheduling, newsletter draft, and analytics tracking. Visual builder makes it manageable.”
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next comparison in your inbox
New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.