Structured Output Benchmark
The benchmark that tests whether LLMs get JSON values right, not just syntax
The Panel's Take
Interfaze's Structured Output Benchmark (SOB) exposes a gap that has been quietly breaking production AI pipelines: models can produce syntactically valid JSON while getting the actual values wrong. SOB measures value accuracy across 21 models using 5,000 text passages, 209 OCR documents, and 115 meeting transcripts — scoring each on seven metrics including value accuracy, faithfulness (grounding vs. hallucination), type safety, and perfect-response rate. The benchmark reveals some sobering findings. Even top models like GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 achieve ~83% on text but drop to 67% on images and only 23.7% on audio. No single model dominates all modalities — GPT-5.4, GLM-4.7, Qwen3.5-35B, and Gemini 2.5 Flash cluster within one point of each other on text. Perfect response rates (all seven metrics correct) rarely exceed 50% for even the best performers. For developers building data extraction pipelines, agents that read invoices, or any system where "correct JSON" means more than syntactically valid JSON, this is required reading. The dataset is on Hugging Face, the paper is on arXiv, and the playground lets you test your own model's structured output capability directly.
Share this verdict
Structured Output Benchmark verdict: SHIP 🚀 3 ships · 1 skip from the expert panel Full review: shiporskip.io/tool/interfaze-structured-output-benchmark-llm-json-accuracy-2026
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next verdict in your inbox
7 critics review a new AI tool every day. Weekly digest — free.
Compare Structured Output Benchmark with Others
Embed this verdict
Tool makers can add a live ShipOrSkip badge to their site. Badge loads track impressions; clicks route back to this review.
<a href="https://shiporskip.io/api/badge-click/interfaze-structured-output-benchmark-llm-json-accuracy-2026" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://shiporskip.io/api/badge/interfaze-structured-output-benchmark-llm-json-accuracy-2026" alt="Structured Output Benchmark Ship verdict on ShipOrSkip" width="360" height="90" /></a>[](https://shiporskip.io/api/badge-click/interfaze-structured-output-benchmark-llm-json-accuracy-2026)<iframe src="https://shiporskip.io/embed/interfaze-structured-output-benchmark-llm-json-accuracy-2026" title="Structured Output Benchmark ShipOrSkip verdict" width="360" height="260" style="border:0;border-radius:16px;max-width:100%;" loading="lazy"></iframe>The reviews
“This is the benchmark I've been waiting for. 'Valid JSON' is table stakes — the real question is whether field values are correct. This plugs a genuine gap in how we evaluate extraction pipelines.”
“The 23.7% audio accuracy stat sounds alarming but the test data is text-normalized before scoring, meaning ASR errors are excluded. It's a better benchmark than most but the methodology choices deserve more scrutiny before you rely on it for vendor selection.”
“No universal winner across modalities is the real story here. As agentic systems increasingly handle mixed-media inputs, this exposes that model selection needs to be task-specific. Benchmarks like SOB are how the industry gets smarter about that.”
“For anyone automating content workflows that extract structured data from documents, briefs, or meeting recordings, this tells you which model to actually trust for each media type. Genuinely useful before you commit to an architecture.”