Vera
A programming language designed for machines, not humans
The Panel's Take
Vera is a programming language built from the ground up for LLMs to write — not humans. Named after the Latin word for truth, it compiles to WebAssembly and runs in both the CLI and browser. Its most radical design choice: it eliminates variable names entirely, replacing them with typed De Bruijn structural references (like `@Int.0` for the most recent integer binding). Research suggests naming confusion is one of the biggest failure modes in AI-generated code — Vera removes the problem at the language level. Every function in Vera must declare `requires()` preconditions, `ensures()` postconditions, and `effects()` side-effect declarations. The compiler uses Z3 formal verification to check contracts at every call site, meaning the AI can't ship code that violates its own preconditions. Error messages are structured JSON with stable codes — written as instructions for AI systems to parse and fix, not human developers to read. Benchmark results are striking: on VeraBench, Kimi K2.5 achieves 100% correctness writing Vera code, outperforming both Python (86%) and TypeScript (91%) implementations. At v0.0.127 with 810+ commits, 127 releases, 3,638 tests, and a 13-chapter spec, this is a serious project — not a weekend experiment. If AI is going to write most of our code, perhaps the code should be designed for AI to write.
Share this verdict
Vera verdict: SKIP ⏭️ 2 ships · 2 skips from the expert panel Full review: shiporskip.io/tool/vera-aallan-ai-native-programming-language-wasm-mit-2026
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next verdict in your inbox
7 critics review a new AI tool every day. Weekly digest — free.
Compare Vera with Others
Embed this verdict
Tool makers can add a live ShipOrSkip badge to their site. Badge loads track impressions; clicks route back to this review.
<a href="https://shiporskip.io/api/badge-click/vera-aallan-ai-native-programming-language-wasm-mit-2026" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://shiporskip.io/api/badge/vera-aallan-ai-native-programming-language-wasm-mit-2026" alt="Vera Skip verdict on ShipOrSkip" width="360" height="90" /></a>[](https://shiporskip.io/api/badge-click/vera-aallan-ai-native-programming-language-wasm-mit-2026)<iframe src="https://shiporskip.io/embed/vera-aallan-ai-native-programming-language-wasm-mit-2026" title="Vera ShipOrSkip verdict" width="360" height="260" style="border:0;border-radius:16px;max-width:100%;" loading="lazy"></iframe>The reviews
“The contracts-first approach is genuinely compelling — I've spent too many hours debugging AI-generated code that violated implicit invariants. Having the compiler enforce preconditions at every call site is the kind of guardrail I'd actually trust. The WASM compilation target means you can run this anywhere, and 3,638 tests suggests this isn't vaporware.”
“A language with no variable names sounds like an academic exercise, not something that'll ship real software. Even if LLMs do great on VeraBench, the ecosystem is zero — no libraries, no community, no integrations. You'd be asking your team to maintain code written in a language nobody else on Earth can read. That's a hard sell even if the AI loves it.”
“Vera represents a fundamental rethink: what if programming languages were designed for their actual authors in 2026 — which are predominantly AI systems? The formal verification backbone means AI-generated code carries a proof of correctness, not just a vibe. This is early, but the trajectory points to a world where AI writes formally verified software by default.”
“I love the philosophical angle — a language where the 'author' is the machine. But until there's a visual toolchain, a debugger humans can read, and something I can demo to a client, this lives in research territory. The JSON error messages designed for AI systems are clever but leave human reviewers completely out of the loop.”