Comparison — 2026
Mike vs Stet
How does the Ship or Skip panel rate each tool? Here's the side-by-side breakdown.
Productivity
Open-source legal AI that reads docs, cites verbatim, and drafts contracts
Productivity
Open-source macOS dictation that sounds like you, not a corporate AI
Reviewer-by-Reviewer
Self-hosted legal AI that runs on your own Claude or Gemini API key is genuinely clever — the pricing model alone makes this worth exploring. The codebase is clean and the tabular citation view is the kind of UX detail that shows someone actually thought about the legal workflow. Deploy this for any firm that's been priced out of Harvey.
Open-source, BYOK, and local-first listening? This is how voice input should work. The Groq integration makes transcription near-instant. I've been using it for commit messages and code comments — genuinely faster than typing for longer explanations.
Solo dev projects in legal tech carry serious liability risk — if the model hallucinates a clause or misses a citation, the consequences aren't a bad tweet, they're malpractice exposure. Until this has real-world usage data from actual attorneys and independent security audits, enterprise law firms should stay cautious. Also, Claude Sonnet or Gemini Flash are not the same as GPT-5.5 fine-tuned on case law.
Apple's built-in dictation has gotten surprisingly good, and it's free with no BYOK setup. The 'preserves your voice' pitch is compelling but subjective — I'd want a side-by-side blind test. Solo indie developer + $7/mo hosted tier raises long-term sustainability questions.
Open-source legal AI is the first credible wedge against the Harvey monopoly on AI-native law. When every solo practitioner and boutique firm can deploy their own matter-scoped AI workspace for free, the power dynamic in legal tech shifts permanently. Mike is the kind of project that looks small today and reshapes an industry in five years.
We're entering an era where voice is the primary interface for AI-assisted work. Tools that get the human-voice preservation problem right now will have a head start when voice input becomes default. Stet's philosophy is the right one.
The tabular review UI is genuinely beautiful for a developer-built open source project — it solves the 'show your work' problem that makes lawyers distrust AI outputs. If the UX holds up under real document loads, this is the design template for AI tools in trust-sensitive industries.
As a writer, dictation tools that rewrite me drive me insane. Stet is the first one that feels like a scribe rather than an editor. The zero-retention policy means I can dictate client-sensitive notes without anxiety. This is the one.
When to Pick Which
Pick Mikeif…
- + The panel shipped it with a 3–1 verdict
- + You need a tool in the Productivity space
- + Pricing works for you: Free (pay only your own API costs) / Self-hosted
Pick Stetif…
- + The panel shipped it with a 3–1 verdict
- + You need a tool in the Productivity space
- + Pricing works for you: Free (BYOK) / $6.99/month