AI Edge Gallery vs Mediator.ai

Google's AI Edge Gallery is a mobile application that turns your Android or iPhone into a local LLM inference machine. Available on Android 12+ and iOS 17+, the app runs open-source models—with particular focus on Google's Gemma 4 family—entirely on-device. No internet required, no data leaves your phone, no API costs. The Gallery supports multi-turn conversation with a Thinking Mode that lets you watch the model's reasoning steps, image analysis through multimodal capabilities, voice transcription and translation, model performance benchmarking on your specific device hardware, and even device automation powered by fine-tuned models. Custom models can be loaded via Hugging Face integration. The updated version with official Gemma 4 support is particularly timely: Gemma 4's 2B parameter model has been benchmarked outperforming its 12B predecessor on multi-turn benchmarks, and running it on a modern iPhone or Android flagship is now genuinely fast. For privacy-conscious users, developers who want to test local inference without cloud costs, or anyone who needs AI capabilities in environments without reliable internet, AI Edge Gallery bridges the gap between cutting-edge open-source models and practical mobile use.

Mediator.ai applies LLMs and Nash bargaining theory to real-world disputes, generating agreements that both parties would accept — including solutions neither side had imagined independently. The process is private by design: each party separately describes their position, priorities, and constraints. The AI then generates multiple candidate agreements, scores each one against both parties' stated needs, and iteratively refines proposals until reaching an optimal solution. Use cases range from founder equity disputes and contractor payment conflicts to shared housing arrangements and inheritance disagreements. The system's key insight is that human negotiation is systematically bad at identifying the entire solution space — we anchor on positions, not interests. By modeling both parties' utility functions simultaneously, the AI can find Pareto-optimal outcomes that pure adversarial negotiation often misses entirely. With 159 Hacker News points, the response was genuinely enthusiastic — and the concept is hard to dismiss. Nash bargaining as a formalism has decades of academic credibility; what's new is making it accessible via natural language input. The pricing isn't published yet and the team is small, but the application domain (legal, HR, personal disputes) is enormous if they can nail trust and confidentiality.