AI tool comparison
AI-Scientist-v2 vs last30days-skill
Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.
Research & Science
AI-Scientist-v2
Sakana AI's autonomous agent that writes peer-reviewed papers
50%
Panel ship
—
Community
Free
Entry
AI-Scientist-v2 is Sakana AI's second-generation autonomous research system that generates scientific papers end-to-end — from hypothesis formation through experimentation, data analysis, and manuscript writing. It's historically notable for producing the first AI-authored workshop paper accepted through peer review. The v2 system removes reliance on human-authored templates that constrained the original, instead using a progressive agentic tree search guided by an experiment manager agent. This makes it more exploratory across ML domains, though Sakana acknowledges it trades v1's high template success rate for broader generalization with lower per-run success. Costs run roughly $20-25 per full research run using Claude 3.5 Sonnet. The system integrates with Semantic Scholar for literature review and supports OpenAI, Gemini, and Claude via AWS Bedrock. The custom license requires disclosure of AI use in resulting publications — a meaningful ethical constraint for a system that could otherwise flood conferences with AI-generated submissions.
Research Tools
last30days-skill
Research any topic across 10+ platforms from the last 30 days
75%
Panel ship
—
Community
Free
Entry
last30days-skill is an AI agent skill that aggregates, deduplicates, and synthesizes recent discussions about any topic from Reddit, X/Twitter, YouTube, Hacker News, Polymarket, Bluesky, TikTok, and Instagram simultaneously. The core value proposition: instead of manually searching eight platforms and stitching together what people are actually saying, you ask once and get a grounded summary with citations ranked by engagement and cross-platform convergence. The ranking system is unusually sophisticated for a community project—it combines text similarity, engagement velocity, source authority, and cross-platform convergence detection (penalizing topics that only appear on one platform). For prediction markets, it evaluates topics as outcomes within broader events rather than naive title matching. A handle resolution feature identifies X/Twitter accounts from natural language names alone. Zero configuration is needed for Reddit, HN, and Polymarket; unlocking other sources requires API keys from ScrapeCreators and Exa. The project reached 18k stars in its first week, largely driven by prompt researchers discovering it surfaces "what actually works" for tools like ChatGPT or Midjourney. Results auto-save to ~/Documents/Last30Days/ by default, and a watchlist mode supports scheduled topic monitoring with an external cron scheduler.
Reviewer scorecard
“For ML research teams, the $20-25 per run cost to get a draft paper with experiments is genuinely interesting as an ideation tool. The tree search approach that explores multiple experimental directions in parallel is the kind of thing that would take a grad student weeks.”
“The cross-platform convergence scoring is clever—topics that only trend on one platform get penalized, which filters out astroturfing and PR-driven hype. The handle resolution for X accounts is a nice touch for competitive intelligence workflows where you know a person's name but not their handle.”
“Sakana's own documentation says v2 has lower success rates than v1 and is 'more exploratory.' Paying $25 for a failed research run with no guarantee of a usable output isn't a workflow most researchers will adopt. The peer review acceptance was a workshop paper — the lowest bar in academic publishing.”
“Most of the headline platforms require paid API keys from ScrapeCreators to actually work, so the 'zero-config' claim is misleading—you get Reddit and HN out of the box, which is not exactly a revelation. The 18k stars look suspiciously like another viral GitHub moment that won't translate to sustained usage.”
“This is the beginning of AI as a genuine research collaborator, not just a writing assistant. Within five years, AI-generated hypotheses tested by autonomous agents will be standard practice in computational fields. AI-Scientist-v2 is primitive version 0.2 of that future.”
“The watchlist mode with scheduled monitoring is the feature that turns this from a one-off research tool into genuine trend intelligence infrastructure. As public discourse increasingly happens in fragmented, platform-specific bubbles, multi-source aggregation with convergence detection becomes essential signal.”
“Science communication is a craft, and the idea of fully automating it makes me uncomfortable. The best papers are ones where researchers deeply understand and can defend every methodological choice — a system that writes the paper for you undermines that accountability.”
“For content creators trying to find what's actually resonating versus what's being pushed, the engagement velocity scoring is invaluable. Knowing that a prompt technique has 1000 upvotes spread over a week versus 1000 upvotes in 2 hours tells you completely different things about audience authenticity.”
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next comparison in your inbox
New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.