Compare/Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

AI tool comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

C

Foundation Models

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's new flagship — 87.6% SWE-bench, 1M context

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

Claude Opus 4.7 is Anthropic's latest flagship model, released April 16. It scores 87.6% on SWE-bench Verified — a 13-point improvement over Claude Opus 4.6 — and 94.2% on GPQA, making it competitive with the top frontier models on coding and scientific reasoning benchmarks. The context window extends to 1 million tokens with substantially improved retrieval accuracy at the far end of the window. The release introduces "Routines" — a first-party feature for defining persistent agentic workflows that Claude can execute autonomously across multiple sessions. Routines are defined in structured YAML and can include tool calls, conditional logic, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints. Anthropic positions this as a more reliable alternative to custom agent frameworks for common use cases. Pricing remains unchanged from Opus 4.6: $5/M input tokens, $25/M output tokens. The vision input resolution has been increased by 3.3x, which meaningfully improves performance on documents, diagrams, and UI screenshots. Available via API immediately and rolling out to Claude.ai Pro and Team plans over the next week.

G

AI Models

GLM-5V-Turbo

The first natively multimodal vision-coding model built for agentic workflows

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

GLM-5V-Turbo is Z.ai's (the international brand of Zhipu AI) latest model — and the first in the GLM family built as a native multimodal agent from the ground up. Released April 1, 2026, it combines vision, video, and text input with agentic output: tool calling, task decomposition, and GUI interaction, all in a single model without vision bolted on as an afterthought. The architecture is built around a new visual encoder called CogViT, trained with reinforcement learning across 30+ task types, and supports a 200K context window with INT8 quantization for fast inference. The practical sweet spot is the "visual artifact → code" pipeline: screenshot-to-HTML, UI component extraction from design mockups, screen recording analysis, and front-end scaffolding from design assets. In early benchmarks, GLM-5V-Turbo outperforms Claude Opus 4.6 on several multimodal benchmarks. It integrates seamlessly with OpenClaw and Claude Code for the full loop — "understand the environment → plan actions → execute tasks" — and is available via the Z.ai API and OpenRouter. For developers building agentic pipelines that start with visual input, this may be the most capable model to benchmark in 2026.

Decision
Claude Opus 4.7
GLM-5V-Turbo
Panel verdict
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
$5/M input · $25/M output (same as Opus 4.6)
API pricing (via OpenRouter / Z.ai)
Best for
Anthropic's new flagship — 87.6% SWE-bench, 1M context
The first natively multimodal vision-coding model built for agentic workflows
Category
Foundation Models
AI Models

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

87.6% on SWE-bench isn't a small improvement — that's a meaningful jump for real-world coding tasks. The Routines feature addresses the biggest pain point with Claude in production: reliable multi-step agent behavior without building a custom framework.

80/100 · ship

Screenshot-to-production-code is the workflow I've been waiting for. GLM-5V-Turbo's native multimodal architecture means it doesn't lose fidelity when switching between seeing the design and writing the implementation. The OpenClaw integration makes it plug into existing pipelines immediately.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

Benchmarks look great but the 1M context window performance hasn't been independently validated at the limits. Routines sound powerful but the YAML spec is still in beta with known edge cases. If you're running stable Opus 4.6 workflows, wait a week for the community to stress-test this before migrating.

45/100 · skip

Benchmark claims from model providers deserve serious scrutiny. 'Beats Opus 4.6 on multimodal benchmarks' is a cherry-picked comparison — we need independent evaluations across diverse real-world tasks before making architectural decisions. Also, the Z.ai data residency story for enterprise is unclear.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

Anthropic is quietly winning the enterprise coding agent race. The combination of top SWE-bench scores with the Routines feature is a moat — developers don't switch orchestration frameworks easily once workflows are deployed. This release deepens that lock-in strategically.

80/100 · ship

The model arms race is increasingly about multimodal-native architectures, not just bigger text models. GLM-5V-Turbo signals that Chinese frontier labs are now genuinely competing on architecture innovation, not just scale. Expect this to pressure OpenAI and Anthropic to ship stronger native vision-coding models.

Creator
80/100 · ship

The 3.3x vision resolution upgrade is underrated for design work. Document analysis, layout review, and iterating on visual mockups are all dramatically better. I can finally paste a full Figma export and get coherent feedback on the entire design rather than just the top half.

80/100 · ship

The GUI interaction capability is huge for creative tooling — a model that can look at a Figma file and generate the component code directly eliminates the translation layer that kills creative momentum. This is the most exciting vision-to-code model I've seen since GPT-4V.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-5V-Turbo: Which AI Tool Should You Ship? — Ship or Skip