Compare/Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta Llama 4

AI tool comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta Llama 4

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

C

AI Models

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's flagship model with task budgets for disciplined agentic work

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

Claude Opus 4.7, released April 16, 2026, is Anthropic's strongest model to date and introduces a meaningful new primitive for agentic work: task budgets. A task budget gives Claude a token target for the entire agentic loop — thinking, tool calls, tool results, and final output — with a running countdown that lets the model prioritize and wind down gracefully rather than running out of context mid-task. Beyond task budgets, Opus 4.7 ships with substantially better vision at higher resolutions, improved creative output quality (better interfaces, slides, and docs), and gains on the hardest software engineering tasks where Opus 4.6 struggled to maintain context across long refactors. Pricing stays flat at $5/1M input and $25/1M output. Available day-one across Claude Pro, API, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot, Opus 4.7 cements Anthropic's position as the go-to model for serious agentic workloads — particularly long-horizon coding sessions that previously needed close human supervision.

M

AI Models

Meta Llama 4

Open-weight multimodal MoE models with 10M context — free to run

Ship

100%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

Meta released Llama 4 Scout and Llama 4 Maverick on April 5, 2026 — the first open-weight natively multimodal models built with a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. Scout is a 17B active parameter model with 16 experts that fits on a single NVIDIA H100, with an industry-leading 10 million token context window. Maverick is also 17B active parameters but with 128 experts, delivering performance that benchmarks comparably to GPT-4o and DeepSeek v3 on reasoning and coding tasks. Both models process text, images, and video inputs, and are freely available for download on Hugging Face and llama.com. Llama 4 Scout was trained on 40 trillion tokens of data. The MoE architecture means the models punch well above their weight in active parameter count — Scout competes with models 5-10x its size on many benchmarks, while keeping inference costs low. This release closes the gap between open and proprietary models significantly. Organizations that previously needed to pay for GPT-4o or Claude for multimodal tasks can now run comparable capability locally or via any cloud provider. For the open-source AI ecosystem, Llama 4 is the biggest release of 2026 so far.

Decision
Claude Opus 4.7
Meta Llama 4
Panel verdict
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Ship · 4 ship / 0 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
$5/1M input · $25/1M output
Free / Open Weight (Meta Llama 4 Community License)
Best for
Anthropic's flagship model with task budgets for disciplined agentic work
Open-weight multimodal MoE models with 10M context — free to run
Category
AI Models
AI Models

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

Task budgets are the most useful new feature in a model release this year. I can now hand off a 4-hour refactor with confidence that Claude won't run off the rails or stall out at 80%. The hard coding gains are real — agentic loops on big codebases feel qualitatively different.

80/100 · ship

A multimodal MoE model that fits on a single H100 and handles 10M context is insane for the price of free. Scout is the model I'll be running for 80% of production workloads going forward — the economics versus GPT-4o or Claude don't even compare. Deploy it now.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

At $25/1M output tokens, a single complex agentic loop can easily cost $5-10. Task budgets help, but they're a bandaid on the fundamental cost problem. For most teams, Sonnet 4.6 delivers 80% of the capability at 20% of the price.

80/100 · ship

I'll still reach for frontier proprietary models for the hardest reasoning tasks and production-critical applications where errors are costly. But I can't deny that Llama 4 Scout closes the gap more than I expected. The 10M context on Scout is genuinely unprecedented for open weights.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

Task budgets represent a real shift in how we think about agent control — not 'stop the agent if it goes wrong' but 'give the agent enough rope to finish, not enough to hang itself.' This mental model will propagate across the industry.

80/100 · ship

Llama 4 will commoditize multimodal AI the same way Llama 2 commoditized text generation. The 10M context window in an open-weight model is a civilizational-level unlock for researchers, non-profits, and countries that can't afford to depend on US cloud providers for advanced AI.

Creator
80/100 · ship

The higher-resolution vision and tasteful output quality improvements are immediately noticeable in design-adjacent tasks. Generating polished slides and landing pages feels less like prompting a robot and more like briefing a designer.

80/100 · ship

An open-weight model that understands images and video means I can build custom creative pipelines without routing everything through proprietary APIs. For studios, agencies, and indie creators, Llama 4 fundamentally changes the cost structure of AI-assisted production.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta Llama 4: Which AI Tool Should You Ship? — Ship or Skip