AI tool comparison
Clicky vs Stet
Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.
Productivity
Clicky
AI assistant that lives next to your cursor and reads your screen
75%
Panel ship
—
Community
Free
Entry
Clicky is a Mac application that surfaces an AI assistant inline — directly adjacent to your cursor — without requiring you to switch windows or paste context manually. The app maintains persistent screen awareness, reading what's in front of you and using that context to answer questions, guide tasks, and make suggestions relevant to what you're doing in any application. Unlike clipboard-based AI tools that require explicit copy-paste workflows, Clicky works through ambient screen reading: you invoke it with a hotkey, it understands the current screen context automatically, and responds inline. The approach is closer to GitHub Copilot's ghost-text model than a chat sidebar — the assistant lives where your attention already is. The indie approach prioritizes a single, focused Mac use case rather than trying to be a cross-platform agent platform. Early Product Hunt reception highlighted the overlay UI and the speed of context capture as standout experiences. For knowledge workers who context-switch constantly between reference material, documentation, and writing tools, the cursor-adjacent model reduces the friction of asking a question by eliminating the need to describe what you're looking at.
Productivity
Stet
Local macOS dictation that sounds like you — not like generic AI prose
75%
Panel ship
—
Community
Free
Entry
Stet is an open-source macOS dictation app that transcribes speech locally and then uses AI to clean up the output while actively preserving your personal writing style and tone. The core innovation is a voice model — a lightweight profile that learns from your past writing so the AI corrections don't flatten your voice into generic AI-ese. The result is meant to sound like you dictated it, not like it was passed through a generic LLM. The technical approach combines local Whisper-based transcription (nothing leaves your device during speech-to-text) with an optional AI refinement pass that can use your own API key (BYOK) or a $6.99/month subscription. The open-source release includes the voice profiling code, making it auditable and forkable. It's a direct response to Wispr Flow, which is closed-source and subscription-only. For writers, podcasters, and productivity users who dictate significant amounts of content, the voice preservation angle is genuinely differentiated. The proliferation of AI writing tools has created a recognizable 'AI voice' — flat, over-structured, and devoid of personality — that sophisticated readers are increasingly adept at detecting. Stet's bet is that preserving your actual voice is the most valuable thing an AI writing assistant can do.
Reviewer scorecard
“The screen-aware context capture is the killer feature — I'm tired of pasting error messages into chat windows. If Clicky accurately reads terminal output and stack traces without me doing anything, that alone justifies the install. The hotkey-invoke pattern feels like the right UX for async assistance.”
“Open-source, local-first transcription with BYOK is the right architecture. I've been burned by voice tools that upload my audio to servers I can't audit. The voice profile approach for preserving style is technically interesting — I want to see how it handles domain-specific jargon and code-switching between formal and casual registers.”
“Persistent screen reading is a significant privacy surface. What data is captured, where it goes, and how it's retained are crucial questions that indie tools often underspecify. This space is also crowded — Cursor, Copilot, and a dozen similar tools already compete for this workflow. What's Clicky's durable advantage?”
“The 'sounds like you' promise needs a lot of data to actually deliver — your voice profile is only as good as the writing samples it's trained on, and most people don't have a consistent, large corpus of their own writing. For casual dictators, this might just be Whisper with extra steps. Apple's built-in dictation is free and surprisingly good now.”
“Cursor-adjacent AI is the right mental model for ambient assistance. We've been training users to alt-tab to a chat window for 3 years; tools like Clicky train the reflex that AI is contextually available wherever attention lands. This interaction paradigm will win.”
“Voice-first computing is coming back, and the arms race for authentic AI writing assistance is heating up. The distinguishing factor won't be transcription accuracy — everyone has solved that — it will be voice fidelity. Stet is building in the right direction: local processing plus personal style models. Expect this architecture to be standard in two years.”
“As someone who constantly switches between design specs, documentation, and writing tools, cursor-adjacent AI is genuinely useful. No more describing a UI element in a chat window — Clicky can just see it. The overlay aesthetic is clean and the indie origin means it'll iterate fast on creator feedback.”
“This is genuinely exciting for writers and content creators. The homogenization of AI-assisted writing is a real aesthetic problem — everything starts sounding like the same LinkedIn post. A tool that actively fights that tendency by learning your specific voice is solving the right problem. Even if the voice model needs work, the direction is exactly right.”
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next comparison in your inbox
New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.