Compare/DeepSeek V4 vs GLM-5.1

AI tool comparison

DeepSeek V4 vs GLM-5.1

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

D

Open Source Models

DeepSeek V4

1.6T open-source MoE that nearly matches frontier — MIT, 1M token context

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

DeepSeek V4 dropped April 24, 2026 as two production-ready Mixture-of-Experts models: V4-Pro (1.6T parameters, 49B activated) and V4-Flash (284B parameters, 13B activated). Both support 1 million token context and ship under the MIT license — the most permissive option in AI. The architecture innovation is the hybrid attention mechanism combining Compressed Sparse Attention (CSA) and Heavily Compressed Attention (HCA), which slashes long-context inference costs dramatically. At 1M tokens, V4-Pro requires only 27% of the FLOPs and 10% of the KV cache compared to DeepSeek V3.2 — a meaningful efficiency gain that makes million-token context economically viable. Performance-wise, DeepSeek V4-Pro beats all rival open models on math and coding benchmarks, trailing only Google's Gemini 3.1-Pro (closed) on world knowledge. One year after V2 upended the industry, DeepSeek has done it again — a model approaching frontier performance that anyone can run, modify, and ship commercially with zero licensing friction.

G

AI Models

GLM-5.1

The first open-source model to beat GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus on real-world coding

Mixed

50%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

GLM-5.1 is a 754-billion parameter open-weights language model released by Z.ai (formerly Zhipu AI) under the MIT license on April 7, 2026. It topped the global SWE-Bench Pro leaderboard with a score of 58.4 — surpassing GPT-5.4 (57.7), Claude Opus 4.6 (57.3), and Gemini 3.1 Pro (54.2) — marking the first time an open-source model has outperformed all leading closed-source models on a widely-cited real-world code repair benchmark. Built on a Mixture-of-Experts architecture and trained entirely on Huawei Ascend 910B chips with zero Nvidia involvement, GLM-5.1 was designed for long-horizon agentic coding. Internal demos showed the model sustaining autonomous task execution for over 8 hours across complex multi-file codebases. The full weights weigh in at 1.51TB on Hugging Face, making self-hosting a serious infrastructure undertaking — but the Z.ai API provides accessible access for teams that can't run the model locally. The significance here is hard to overstate: open-source has spent two years chasing the frontier on coding benchmarks, and GLM-5.1 just crossed it. MIT licensing means commercial use without royalties, and training on non-Nvidia hardware is a notable signal that the hardware moat around frontier AI is cracking. Expect rapid community fine-tunes and distillations in the weeks ahead.

Decision
DeepSeek V4
GLM-5.1
Panel verdict
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Mixed · 2 ship / 2 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Open Source / MIT
Open Source (MIT) / API available
Best for
1.6T open-source MoE that nearly matches frontier — MIT, 1M token context
The first open-source model to beat GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus on real-world coding
Category
Open Source Models
AI Models

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

MIT license on a 1M context model that beats GPT-5 on coding evals is wild. V4-Flash at 13B active params is particularly practical — you get near-frontier coding performance with inference costs that don't require a mortgage. Ship immediately.

80/100 · ship

A 754B MIT-licensed model that actually beats GPT-5.4 on SWE-Bench Pro is the kind of release you stop what you're doing for. The API is live today and the weights are on Hugging Face. If you're building coding tools, agentic pipelines, or anything touching code generation, this is a must-benchmark immediately.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

Running 1.6T parameters requires infrastructure most companies don't have, and DeepSeek's API has had reliability issues before. The 'MIT license' is less useful when you're dependent on their API anyway. Wait for quantized local versions to stabilize.

45/100 · skip

1.51TB to self-host is not practical for 99% of teams, and SWE-Bench Pro captures one narrow slice of what makes a model useful in production. The 8-hour autonomous demo sounds impressive until you realize that's a cherry-picked task — real enterprise coding pipelines are messier. The API pricing will matter more than the benchmark.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

The efficiency breakthrough is the story. If 1M-token context now costs 73% less to serve, that changes the economics of an entire class of applications. DeepSeek is compressing the frontier timeline faster than anyone predicted a year ago.

80/100 · ship

The first open-source model to beat all closed frontier models on a meaningful coding benchmark is an inflection point. The story of sovereign AI, non-Nvidia training stacks, and MIT-licensed weights converging in one model release is the geopolitical tech story of 2026. Distillations will bring this capability to consumer hardware within months.

Creator
80/100 · ship

A million-token context means I can feed an entire brand style guide, all past campaign materials, and a full brief into one call. V4-Flash is fast enough for real-time creative iteration. This is now my go-to for long-context creative workflows.

45/100 · skip

This is a tools-for-engineers release with zero direct value for creators right now. The downstream effect — better open-source coding agents that help build creative tools — will matter eventually. Wait for the apps built on top of it.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later

DeepSeek V4 vs GLM-5.1: Which AI Tool Should You Ship? — Ship or Skip