Compare/Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.1

AI tool comparison

Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.1

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

G

AI Models

Gemma 4

Google's sharpest open models — multimodal, 256K context, runs on a Raspberry Pi

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

Gemma 4 is Google DeepMind's fourth-generation open model family, released April 2, 2026, under Apache 2.0. Four variants ship in the family: E2B and E4B edge models that run fully offline on phones, Raspberry Pi, and NVIDIA Jetson; a 26B Mixture-of-Experts model that activates only 3.8B parameters at inference; and a 31B Dense flagship. The 31B scores 1452 on the Arena AI text leaderboard (third among all open models), hits 89.2% on AIME 2026 math, and 85.2% on MMLU Pro — versus Gemma 3's 20.8% on AIME. All four model sizes accept text and image inputs. The edge models additionally handle native audio and video, making them the first on-device models with full multimodal coverage. Context windows reach 256K tokens on the large variants, enabling entire codebases or long documents in a single prompt. Native support for tool use, structured output, and agentic workflows is baked in from the start. For the open-source AI community, Gemma 4 is a watershed: a commercially permissive model that genuinely competes with closed-source alternatives on reasoning benchmarks. Gemma downloads crossed 400 million before this launch — Gemma 4's edge deployment story, combining on-device inference with frontier-class reasoning, looks set to make that number look small.

G

AI Models

GLM-5.1

First open-source model to top SWE-bench Pro — 744B MoE, MIT, zero Nvidia

Mixed

50%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

GLM-5.1 is Z.ai's (formerly Zhipu AI) open-weight model released April 7, 2026 under the MIT license. It's a 744-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 40 billion active parameters per token, a 200K-token context window, and a 131K maximum output length — and it became the first open-source model ever to lead SWE-bench Pro, scoring 58.4% versus Claude Opus 4.6's 57.3%. The training story is almost as remarkable as the performance. GLM-5.1 was trained entirely on approximately 100,000 Huawei Ascend 910B chips using the MindSpore framework — no Nvidia hardware was used at any point. That makes it one of the first frontier-tier models to demonstrate that the CUDA monoculture isn't technically mandatory for training state-of-the-art models. Z.ai became the first publicly traded foundation model company via a Hong Kong IPO in January 2026 (~$558M raised). The model is free to download from HuggingFace and also available via API at $0.95 per million input tokens. In agentic demonstrations, it has run autonomously for eight hours straight — 655 planning and execution iterations — without human checkpoints.

Decision
Gemma 4
GLM-5.1
Panel verdict
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Mixed · 2 ship / 2 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Free / Open Source (Apache 2.0)
Open Source (MIT) / API $0.95/M input tokens
Best for
Google's sharpest open models — multimodal, 256K context, runs on a Raspberry Pi
First open-source model to top SWE-bench Pro — 744B MoE, MIT, zero Nvidia
Category
AI Models
AI Models

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

Apache 2.0, runs on a Pi, 256K context, beats proprietary models on AIME — this is the open-source AI stack I've been waiting for. The agentic workflow support baked in natively means I'm not bolting on separate tooling. Shipping today.

80/100 · ship

MIT license, top SWE-bench Pro score, $0.95/M via API. If your use case is agentic coding and you're not evaluating GLM-5.1, you're leaving real performance on the table. The 8-hour autonomous run capability is compelling for long-horizon task pipelines.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

The benchmark numbers are impressive on paper, but Gemma 3 was also hyped and underdelivered in production on complex multi-step tasks. The edge models are still unproven outside of Google's own hardware partnerships. Watch the community benchmarks before committing to a migration.

45/100 · skip

SWE-bench Pro is one benchmark. The broader coding composite (Terminal-Bench 2.0 + NL2Repo) still has Claude Opus 4.6 ahead at 57.5 vs GLM-5.1's 54.9. Running 744B locally requires hardware most teams don't own, and the API's Chinese jurisdiction will trigger compliance blockers for many organizations.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

On-device frontier-class intelligence with native audio and video is the inflection point for ambient AI. When a $35 Raspberry Pi can run a model that beats last year's GPT-4 on math, the entire economics of edge AI applications change overnight. This is the model that makes AI infrastructure costs asymptotically cheap.

80/100 · ship

The Huawei chip training story matters more than the benchmark ranking. If GLM-5.1 proves you can train frontier models without Nvidia at scale, it fractures the GPU supply chain narrative that's been shaping geopolitics and AI policy discussions for years. This is a proof of concept with enormous implications.

Creator
80/100 · ship

The document and PDF parsing, OCR, chart comprehension, and UI understanding built into every model size is huge for creative workflow automation. I can finally build tools that read design briefs, invoices, and mockups without needing a cloud API call. The offline capability means client data never leaves my machine.

45/100 · skip

For creative workflows, the 744B MoE overhead is overkill and local deployment requires datacenter-grade hardware that's nowhere near indie studio territory. The MIT license is great, but the gap between 'free to download' and 'free to actually run' is vast at this parameter count.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later