Compare/Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.1

AI tool comparison

Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.1

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

G

AI Models

Gemma 4

Google's sharpest open models — multimodal, 256K context, runs on a Raspberry Pi

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

Gemma 4 is Google DeepMind's fourth-generation open model family, released April 2, 2026, under Apache 2.0. Four variants ship in the family: E2B and E4B edge models that run fully offline on phones, Raspberry Pi, and NVIDIA Jetson; a 26B Mixture-of-Experts model that activates only 3.8B parameters at inference; and a 31B Dense flagship. The 31B scores 1452 on the Arena AI text leaderboard (third among all open models), hits 89.2% on AIME 2026 math, and 85.2% on MMLU Pro — versus Gemma 3's 20.8% on AIME. All four model sizes accept text and image inputs. The edge models additionally handle native audio and video, making them the first on-device models with full multimodal coverage. Context windows reach 256K tokens on the large variants, enabling entire codebases or long documents in a single prompt. Native support for tool use, structured output, and agentic workflows is baked in from the start. For the open-source AI community, Gemma 4 is a watershed: a commercially permissive model that genuinely competes with closed-source alternatives on reasoning benchmarks. Gemma downloads crossed 400 million before this launch — Gemma 4's edge deployment story, combining on-device inference with frontier-class reasoning, looks set to make that number look small.

G

AI Models

GLM-5.1

Zhipu AI's 744B MIT-licensed model that beats Claude and GPT on SWE-Bench

Mixed

50%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

GLM-5.1 is Zhipu AI's latest open-weights language model — a 744B parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture that activates 40B parameters per forward pass. Released under the MIT license with a 200,000-token context window, it has quietly topped the SWE-Bench Pro leaderboard, surpassing both Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 on expert-level software engineering tasks. The MoE architecture means GLM-5.1 is significantly cheaper to run per token than a dense 744B model, with inference costs approaching dense 40B models for most workloads. Zhipu AI (a Tsinghua University spin-out) has steadily iterated on the GLM family to produce a text-focused reasoning model that holds its own against proprietary frontier models — now, for the first time, reportedly exceeding them on coding benchmarks. The MIT license is the headline for enterprise and research users: full commercial use, no usage restrictions, no API dependency. This puts GLM-5.1 in direct competition with Qwen3.5 for the "best open-weights model you can actually use for anything" crown, with a differentiating edge in software engineering tasks specifically.

Decision
Gemma 4
GLM-5.1
Panel verdict
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Mixed · 2 ship / 2 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Free / Open Source (Apache 2.0)
Open Source (MIT)
Best for
Google's sharpest open models — multimodal, 256K context, runs on a Raspberry Pi
Zhipu AI's 744B MIT-licensed model that beats Claude and GPT on SWE-Bench
Category
AI Models
AI Models

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

Apache 2.0, runs on a Pi, 256K context, beats proprietary models on AIME — this is the open-source AI stack I've been waiting for. The agentic workflow support baked in natively means I'm not bolting on separate tooling. Shipping today.

80/100 · ship

SWE-Bench Pro beating Claude and GPT-5.4 is the real signal here. For coding automation workflows, having an MIT-licensed 200K context model at that quality tier changes the build-vs-buy calculus significantly. Deploying this on dedicated hardware is now a serious option for engineering teams.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

The benchmark numbers are impressive on paper, but Gemma 3 was also hyped and underdelivered in production on complex multi-step tasks. The edge models are still unproven outside of Google's own hardware partnerships. Watch the community benchmarks before committing to a migration.

45/100 · skip

744B total parameters still requires serious infrastructure — you're looking at 8x H100s at minimum for comfortable inference. The 40B active parameters help with cost but not with deployment complexity. This is 'open source' for well-funded teams, not indie builders.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

On-device frontier-class intelligence with native audio and video is the inflection point for ambient AI. When a $35 Raspberry Pi can run a model that beats last year's GPT-4 on math, the entire economics of edge AI applications change overnight. This is the model that makes AI infrastructure costs asymptotically cheap.

80/100 · ship

The open-weights ecosystem has now fully caught up to proprietary models on the most demanding software engineering benchmarks. This is the moment the 'open vs closed' debate definitively changes — the argument that proprietary models are categorically better no longer holds.

Creator
80/100 · ship

The document and PDF parsing, OCR, chart comprehension, and UI understanding built into every model size is huge for creative workflow automation. I can finally build tools that read design briefs, invoices, and mockups without needing a cloud API call. The offline capability means client data never leaves my machine.

45/100 · skip

Unless you're a creative tech team with serious infrastructure, this isn't practical for most creative workflows. The quality is undeniably impressive but the deployment story doesn't fit solo creators or small studios.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later

Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.1: Which AI Tool Should You Ship? — Ship or Skip