AI tool comparison
GLM-5.1 vs Tencent Hy3 Preview
Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.
AI Models
GLM-5.1
First open-source model to top SWE-bench Pro — 744B MoE, MIT, zero Nvidia
50%
Panel ship
—
Community
Paid
Entry
GLM-5.1 is Z.ai's (formerly Zhipu AI) open-weight model released April 7, 2026 under the MIT license. It's a 744-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 40 billion active parameters per token, a 200K-token context window, and a 131K maximum output length — and it became the first open-source model ever to lead SWE-bench Pro, scoring 58.4% versus Claude Opus 4.6's 57.3%. The training story is almost as remarkable as the performance. GLM-5.1 was trained entirely on approximately 100,000 Huawei Ascend 910B chips using the MindSpore framework — no Nvidia hardware was used at any point. That makes it one of the first frontier-tier models to demonstrate that the CUDA monoculture isn't technically mandatory for training state-of-the-art models. Z.ai became the first publicly traded foundation model company via a Hong Kong IPO in January 2026 (~$558M raised). The model is free to download from HuggingFace and also available via API at $0.95 per million input tokens. In agentic demonstrations, it has run autonomously for eight hours straight — 655 planning and execution iterations — without human checkpoints.
AI Models
Tencent Hy3 Preview
295B MoE open weights — China's most efficient frontier model yet
75%
Panel ship
—
Community
Paid
Entry
Tencent open-sourced Hy3 Preview on April 23, 2026 — the first model to emerge from the company's rebuilt AI infrastructure, and its most credible challenge to frontier closed models to date. With 295 billion total parameters but only 21 billion active at inference time (plus 3.8B MTP layer parameters), it's a Mixture-of-Experts architecture that punches far above its compute weight. The model supports up to 256K context and is available via Hugging Face, ModelScope, and GitCode under the Tencent Hy Community License. On coding benchmarks, Hy3 scores 74.4% on SWE-bench Verified, 54.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.0, and 67.1% on BrowseComp — placing it firmly in the same tier as top models from Anthropic and OpenAI. Tencent claims a 40% efficiency improvement over its predecessor Hunyuan models, and pricing through Tencent Cloud TokenHub is aggressive: RMB 1.2 per million input tokens. A free two-week window at launch via OpenRouter made it widely accessible immediately. The model was led by a team that includes former OpenAI researchers and has already been deployed across Tencent's core products — WeChat, Yuanbao, and QQ. That production integration is a meaningful signal: this isn't a benchmark vanity release. For developers who need a powerful, cost-efficient reasoning and agentic model with actual open weights, Hy3 Preview is one of the most interesting drops of April 2026.
Reviewer scorecard
“MIT license, top SWE-bench Pro score, $0.95/M via API. If your use case is agentic coding and you're not evaluating GLM-5.1, you're leaving real performance on the table. The 8-hour autonomous run capability is compelling for long-horizon task pipelines.”
“21B active params with 295B total — this is genuinely practical to deploy on reasonable hardware while matching models 10x the inference cost. The 256K context and strong SWE-bench score make it a legitimate option for agentic coding pipelines. I'd use this today.”
“SWE-bench Pro is one benchmark. The broader coding composite (Terminal-Bench 2.0 + NL2Repo) still has Claude Opus 4.6 ahead at 57.5 vs GLM-5.1's 54.9. Running 744B locally requires hardware most teams don't own, and the API's Chinese jurisdiction will trigger compliance blockers for many organizations.”
“The Tencent Hy Community License is not Apache 2.0 or MIT — read it carefully before using this in production. There are usage restrictions that could bite commercial deployments. Also, benchmark scores look great, but independent evals of Chinese labs' models have historically diverged from self-reported numbers.”
“The Huawei chip training story matters more than the benchmark ranking. If GLM-5.1 proves you can train frontier models without Nvidia at scale, it fractures the GPU supply chain narrative that's been shaping geopolitics and AI policy discussions for years. This is a proof of concept with enormous implications.”
“The MoE efficiency race is the actual story here — we're getting frontier-class capability at a fraction of the activation cost. Hy3 is proof that the compute-vs-capability Pareto frontier keeps moving. Open weights with real deployment signals (WeChat at scale) is a combination that matters.”
“For creative workflows, the 744B MoE overhead is overkill and local deployment requires datacenter-grade hardware that's nowhere near indie studio territory. The MIT license is great, but the gap between 'free to download' and 'free to actually run' is vast at this parameter count.”
“Strong visual coding capabilities and multimodal understanding make this genuinely useful for design-to-code workflows. The health image analysis and product comparison use cases already deployed in Yuanbao show real-world creative utility beyond pure benchmark games.”
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next comparison in your inbox
New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.