Compare/GLM-5.1 vs Ternary Bonsai

AI tool comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Ternary Bonsai

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

G

AI Models

GLM-5.1

#1 on SWE-Bench Pro — Zhipu's open 754B MoE beats GPT-5 on coding

Mixed

50%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

Z.ai (formerly Zhipu AI) has released GLM-5.1, a 754B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model that's currently sitting at #1 on SWE-Bench Pro with a score of 58.4 — outperforming GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6 on long-horizon software engineering tasks. The model ships under MIT license with full weights on HuggingFace. GLM-5.1 was specifically designed for agentic software engineering workflows: multi-file reasoning, autonomous test-run-fix loops, and extended coding sessions that span hundreds of tool calls. It's not just a capability leap — at 754B active parameters via sparse MoE, it can be run more efficiently than a dense model of equivalent capability on a sufficiently provisioned cluster. The SWE-Bench Pro result is significant because that benchmark is harder to game than vanilla SWE-Bench Verified. It tests whether a model can resolve real GitHub issues with correct tests, proper diffs, and no regressions — the things that actually matter in production. For anyone running self-hosted coding agents or building on open models, GLM-5.1 just became the new baseline to beat.

T

Open Source Models

Ternary Bonsai

1.58-bit LLMs that run at 82 tok/s on M4 Pro and on your iPhone

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

PrismML's Ternary Bonsai is a family of aggressively quantized language models that take the BitNet concept to its logical extreme. Each weight is constrained to one of three values — {-1, 0, +1} — with a shared FP16 scale factor per 128-weight group. No higher-precision escape hatches, no hybrid layers. The result is a 9x reduction in memory footprint versus standard 16-bit models. The numbers are striking: the 8B model fits in 1.75 GB and hits 82 tokens per second on an M4 Pro. More impressively, it runs at 27 tokens per second on an iPhone 17 Pro Max — fast enough for real-time conversation on-device. The 8B variant scores 75.5 average across standard benchmarks, outperforming many models that are 9-10x larger. The 4B and 1.7B variants push further into mobile-optimized territory. All three models are released under the Apache 2.0 license, available on Hugging Face and GitHub, and integrated into the Locally AI iOS app for immediate on-device deployment. For developers building privacy-sensitive applications or anyone tired of paying cloud inference costs, Ternary Bonsai offers a compelling on-device alternative that doesn't require a beefy GPU.

Decision
GLM-5.1
Ternary Bonsai
Panel verdict
Mixed · 2 ship / 2 skip
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Open Source / MIT
Open Source / Apache 2.0 / Free
Best for
#1 on SWE-Bench Pro — Zhipu's open 754B MoE beats GPT-5 on coding
1.58-bit LLMs that run at 82 tok/s on M4 Pro and on your iPhone
Category
AI Models
Open Source Models

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

If the SWE-Bench Pro numbers hold up under independent replication, this is the first open model that can genuinely replace a proprietary API for serious agentic coding work. MIT license means you can fine-tune and deploy on your own infra. This is a big deal.

80/100 · ship

82 tokens per second on M4 Pro in 1.75 GB is a genuinely impressive engineering achievement. For local tooling, code assistants, or any latency-sensitive workload where I don't want cloud round-trips, this hits a sweet spot that larger quantized models miss. Apache 2.0 means I can embed it in commercial apps without legal headaches.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

754B parameters is not something 99% of developers can run locally. You need a multi-GPU cluster or serious cloud spend. The benchmark numbers are from Z.ai's own evaluations, and Zhipu has a history of optimistic benchmarking. Wait for independent replications.

45/100 · skip

A 75.5 benchmark average sounds good until you compare it against 8B models quantized with GGUF Q8 — which score similarly and have years of tooling, community support, and production deployments behind them. The 9x memory savings matter on constrained devices but less so on any machine with 16GB+ RAM. Niche but real use case.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

A Chinese lab shipping an MIT-licensed model that tops global coding benchmarks is a watershed moment for open-source AI. The geopolitical implications are real — this is the model that makes US export controls look strategically shortsighted.

80/100 · ship

On-device AI at 27 tokens per second on a phone is the inflection point that makes LLMs a platform primitive rather than a cloud service. Once inference is this cheap and fast on commodity hardware, the entire economic model of AI-as-API-call collapses. Ternary quantization is an early signal of where efficiency research is heading.

Creator
45/100 · skip

Unless you're building coding tools or agent infrastructure, a 754B MoE model doesn't move the needle for creative applications. The energy and infra overhead for creative use cases doesn't pencil out versus smaller, cheaper models.

80/100 · ship

The prospect of running a capable LLM entirely on my iPhone without sending any data to a server is genuinely exciting for creative work with sensitive material. Drafting, editing, and ideation without a cloud subscription or privacy concerns — I'd pay for that, and here it's free.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later