Compare/GLM-5.1 vs SAM 3.1

AI tool comparison

GLM-5.1 vs SAM 3.1

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

G

AI Models

GLM-5.1

#1 on SWE-Bench Pro — 744B MoE model that runs autonomously for 8 hours

Mixed

50%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

GLM-5.1 is Z.AI's post-training upgrade of the 744B Mixture-of-Experts GLM-5 model, and it has just claimed the top spot on SWE-Bench Pro with a score of 58.4 — beating GPT-5.4 (57.7), Claude Opus 4.6 (57.3), and Gemini 3.1 Pro (54.2). The model is designed for long-horizon agentic tasks and can run autonomously for up to 8 hours across thousands of iterations on a single problem. The agentic capabilities include extended context retention, tool-calling with recovery loops, and a reinforcement-trained "persistence" mode that keeps the model on-task through failures and dead ends rather than surfacing errors to the user. The model was trained entirely on Huawei Ascend 910B chips using the MindSpore framework — no US silicon, no CUDA. The geopolitical dimension is as significant as the technical one: GLM-5.1 is direct evidence that US export controls on Nvidia hardware have not meaningfully slowed China's frontier model development. The 8-hour autonomous execution window is also a step-change from current agentic systems that struggle past 20-30 minutes of coherent work — if this benchmark holds up in real-world testing, it's a genuine advancement in the class of problems AI agents can independently solve.

S

Computer Vision

SAM 3.1

Meta's Segment Anything doubles video speed via object multiplexing

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

SAM 3.1 is Meta's latest update to the Segment Anything Model family, released March 27 2026 as a drop-in replacement for SAM 3. The core innovation is object multiplexing: where the previous model required a separate processing pass for each tracked object, SAM 3.1 processes all tracked objects together in a single shared-memory pass, eliminating redundant computation across the decoder. The result is a doubling of throughput for videos with a medium number of objects—from 16 to 32 frames per second on a single H100 GPU—without sacrificing tracking accuracy. For applications like sports analytics, surveillance, or video editing that track 5–20 objects simultaneously, this makes real-time deployment on commodity cloud hardware feasible for the first time. SAM 3.1 inherits SAM 3's open-vocabulary segmentation capability (segmenting objects described by text prompts), which achieved 75–80% of human performance on the SA-CO benchmark covering 270K unique concepts. The model checkpoint is available on Hugging Face at `facebook/sam3.1`, and the codebase supports fine-tuning via the facebookresearch/sam3 repository. Meta released SAM 3.1 under a research license with commercial use provisions similar to its predecessors.

Decision
GLM-5.1
SAM 3.1
Panel verdict
Mixed · 2 ship / 2 skip
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
API (pricing TBD)
Free (Research License)
Best for
#1 on SWE-Bench Pro — 744B MoE model that runs autonomously for 8 hours
Meta's Segment Anything doubles video speed via object multiplexing
Category
AI Models
Computer Vision

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

If the 8-hour autonomous execution claim is real and not cherry-picked, this changes the calculus for using AI on genuinely hard engineering problems. SWE-Bench Pro #1 is also a credible metric — I want to test this on my own repos immediately.

80/100 · ship

The multiplexing change is a genuine architectural improvement, not just parameter tuning—processing all objects together means inference cost no longer scales linearly with object count. For video pipelines tracking 10+ objects this completely changes the cost calculus for real-time deployment.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

SWE-Bench benchmarks have historically shown poor correlation with real-world coding productivity, and the '8-hour autonomous' claim needs independent validation. Z.AI is also a relatively unknown quantity compared to Anthropic or Google — API reliability and pricing are completely unproven.

45/100 · skip

32 fps on a single H100 sounds impressive until you price H100 cloud time. The research license also creates uncertainty for commercial applications—Meta's licensing terms have quietly shifted in the past, and building a production pipeline on 'research license with commercial provisions' is asking for future legal headaches.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

The strategic significance of a Chinese lab hitting #1 on the coding benchmark using zero US hardware cannot be overstated. The export control strategy is officially not working as intended, and GLM-5.1 will accelerate the geopolitical AI arms race in ways that reshape the entire industry.

80/100 · ship

Segment Anything reaching real-time speeds on multi-object video unlocks an entire category of applications that were previously GPU-prohibitive: live sports analysis, real-time video editing, autonomous driving perception. SAM 3.1 is infrastructure for the next wave of vision applications.

Creator
45/100 · skip

For creative work, I need a model with strong multimodal capabilities and reliable API access — both unproven for GLM-5.1. The coding benchmark lead is impressive but not directly relevant to my workflows. I'll wait for independent reviews before switching.

80/100 · ship

The open-vocabulary segmentation is what excites me most—being able to say 'segment the red jacket' rather than clicking a point means non-technical creative professionals can actually use this in video workflows. The speed improvement makes it viable in real-time editing tools.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later