Compare/GLM-5.1 vs Tencent Hy3 Preview

AI tool comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Tencent Hy3 Preview

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

G

AI Models

GLM-5.1

Zhipu AI's 744B MIT-licensed model that beats Claude and GPT on SWE-Bench

Mixed

50%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

GLM-5.1 is Zhipu AI's latest open-weights language model — a 744B parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture that activates 40B parameters per forward pass. Released under the MIT license with a 200,000-token context window, it has quietly topped the SWE-Bench Pro leaderboard, surpassing both Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 on expert-level software engineering tasks. The MoE architecture means GLM-5.1 is significantly cheaper to run per token than a dense 744B model, with inference costs approaching dense 40B models for most workloads. Zhipu AI (a Tsinghua University spin-out) has steadily iterated on the GLM family to produce a text-focused reasoning model that holds its own against proprietary frontier models — now, for the first time, reportedly exceeding them on coding benchmarks. The MIT license is the headline for enterprise and research users: full commercial use, no usage restrictions, no API dependency. This puts GLM-5.1 in direct competition with Qwen3.5 for the "best open-weights model you can actually use for anything" crown, with a differentiating edge in software engineering tasks specifically.

T

AI Models

Tencent Hy3 Preview

295B MoE open weights — China's most efficient frontier model yet

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

Tencent open-sourced Hy3 Preview on April 23, 2026 — the first model to emerge from the company's rebuilt AI infrastructure, and its most credible challenge to frontier closed models to date. With 295 billion total parameters but only 21 billion active at inference time (plus 3.8B MTP layer parameters), it's a Mixture-of-Experts architecture that punches far above its compute weight. The model supports up to 256K context and is available via Hugging Face, ModelScope, and GitCode under the Tencent Hy Community License. On coding benchmarks, Hy3 scores 74.4% on SWE-bench Verified, 54.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.0, and 67.1% on BrowseComp — placing it firmly in the same tier as top models from Anthropic and OpenAI. Tencent claims a 40% efficiency improvement over its predecessor Hunyuan models, and pricing through Tencent Cloud TokenHub is aggressive: RMB 1.2 per million input tokens. A free two-week window at launch via OpenRouter made it widely accessible immediately. The model was led by a team that includes former OpenAI researchers and has already been deployed across Tencent's core products — WeChat, Yuanbao, and QQ. That production integration is a meaningful signal: this isn't a benchmark vanity release. For developers who need a powerful, cost-efficient reasoning and agentic model with actual open weights, Hy3 Preview is one of the most interesting drops of April 2026.

Decision
GLM-5.1
Tencent Hy3 Preview
Panel verdict
Mixed · 2 ship / 2 skip
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Open Source (MIT)
Open Weights (Tencent Hy Community License); API from RMB 1.2/M tokens
Best for
Zhipu AI's 744B MIT-licensed model that beats Claude and GPT on SWE-Bench
295B MoE open weights — China's most efficient frontier model yet
Category
AI Models
AI Models

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

SWE-Bench Pro beating Claude and GPT-5.4 is the real signal here. For coding automation workflows, having an MIT-licensed 200K context model at that quality tier changes the build-vs-buy calculus significantly. Deploying this on dedicated hardware is now a serious option for engineering teams.

80/100 · ship

21B active params with 295B total — this is genuinely practical to deploy on reasonable hardware while matching models 10x the inference cost. The 256K context and strong SWE-bench score make it a legitimate option for agentic coding pipelines. I'd use this today.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

744B total parameters still requires serious infrastructure — you're looking at 8x H100s at minimum for comfortable inference. The 40B active parameters help with cost but not with deployment complexity. This is 'open source' for well-funded teams, not indie builders.

45/100 · skip

The Tencent Hy Community License is not Apache 2.0 or MIT — read it carefully before using this in production. There are usage restrictions that could bite commercial deployments. Also, benchmark scores look great, but independent evals of Chinese labs' models have historically diverged from self-reported numbers.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

The open-weights ecosystem has now fully caught up to proprietary models on the most demanding software engineering benchmarks. This is the moment the 'open vs closed' debate definitively changes — the argument that proprietary models are categorically better no longer holds.

80/100 · ship

The MoE efficiency race is the actual story here — we're getting frontier-class capability at a fraction of the activation cost. Hy3 is proof that the compute-vs-capability Pareto frontier keeps moving. Open weights with real deployment signals (WeChat at scale) is a combination that matters.

Creator
45/100 · skip

Unless you're a creative tech team with serious infrastructure, this isn't practical for most creative workflows. The quality is undeniably impressive but the deployment story doesn't fit solo creators or small studios.

80/100 · ship

Strong visual coding capabilities and multimodal understanding make this genuinely useful for design-to-code workflows. The health image analysis and product comparison use cases already deployed in Yuanbao show real-world creative utility beyond pure benchmark games.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later