Compare/Goose v1.29 vs Make

AI tool comparison

Goose v1.29 vs Make

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

G

AI Agents

Goose v1.29

The open-source AI agent that uses your Claude, Gemini, or ChatGPT subscription

Skip

25%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

Block's open-source on-machine AI agent just hit v1.29, introducing Gemini ACP (Agent Client Protocol) support so you can run the full Goose agent stack using your existing Google subscription — no separate API key needed. It also added orchestration for sub-agents, adversarial agent mode to prevent information leaks, delegate sub-agent log display, and macOS sandboxing. With 35k+ GitHub stars and Rust-based architecture, Goose goes far beyond autocomplete: it builds projects, writes and executes code, manages files, and calls external APIs autonomously. The ACP approach means your Goose extensions are passed directly to Gemini, deepening the connection compared to plain CLI usage.

M

Automation

Make

Visual automation platform — like Zapier but more powerful

Ship

100%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform with drag-and-drop workflow building. More powerful than Zapier for complex scenarios with branching, loops, and data transformation. 1,800+ app integrations.

Decision
Goose v1.29
Make
Panel verdict
Skip · 1 ship / 3 skip
Ship · 3 ship / 0 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Free / Open source (Apache 2.0). Use your own AI subscription (Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT) — no additional per-token cost.
Free tier / $10.59/mo Core / $18.82/mo Pro
Best for
The open-source AI agent that uses your Claude, Gemini, or ChatGPT subscription
Visual automation platform — like Zapier but more powerful
Category
AI Agents
Automation

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

This is exactly the architecture I want: a local agent that doesn't lock me into one AI provider's billing. The Gemini ACP integration means my Google One subscription now funds actual dev automation. The adversarial agent mode is also clever — finally an agent that polices itself before it nukes your filesystem.

80/100 · ship

More powerful than Zapier for complex workflows — branching, loops, error handling. The visual builder makes complex logic readable. Great for non-trivial automation.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

Multi-agent orchestration sounds great until you're debugging a cascade failure at 2am wondering which sub-agent hallucinated first. The 35k stars are real but so is the complexity overhead. Claude Code and Cursor 3 have more polish for day-to-day use — Goose still feels like a power-user project.

80/100 · ship

Steeper learning curve than Zapier but the ceiling is much higher. If your automation needs are simple, Zapier is easier. If they're complex, Make is better.

Futurist
45/100 · hot

The ACP subscription model is the thin edge of a wedge that eventually makes AI provider lock-in irrelevant. When agents can switch between Claude, Gemini, and GPT seamlessly based on cost and availability, the moat moves to the orchestration layer. Block is quietly building that layer in the open.

No panel take
Creator
45/100 · skip

The MCP Apps and rich UI stuff is interesting for creative workflows, but Goose is fundamentally a developer tool. The learning curve before it does anything useful for non-devs is steep. I'll check back when the Neighborhood Extension for ordering food is the least niche thing it can do.

80/100 · ship

I use Make for my content pipeline — new blog post triggers social media scheduling, newsletter draft, and analytics tracking. Visual builder makes it manageable.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later