Compare/QSAG-Core vs Shannon

AI tool comparison

QSAG-Core vs Shannon

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

Q

Security

QSAG-Core

Open-source security scanner purpose-built for AI agent systems and MCP deployments

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

QSAG-Core is a Python security scanner specifically designed for the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026 threat model. It provides three core detection capabilities: MCP tool poisoning (26 malicious patterns across 7 categories), prompt injection (28+ attack patterns including goal hijacking, jailbreak attempts, and memory poisoning), and ghost agent detection for unauthorized API key usage. It runs as pure pattern matching — no ML, no cloud dependency — and can be integrated as a pre-execution guard in any Python-based agent pipeline. Released April 10, 2026 by the Neoxyber team, QSAG-Core fills a real operational gap as MCP-based agent deployments proliferate. While Microsoft's Agent Governance Toolkit addresses similar territory, it's heavyweight and enterprise-focused. QSAG-Core is a pip install and a few lines of code — the security-focused indie alternative that fits into a CI/CD pipeline or an existing agent framework without an enterprise contract. The threat model it addresses is timely. As MCP becomes the de facto standard for tool-calling in AI agents, malicious MCP servers and prompt injection via tool outputs are becoming documented attack vectors. Having a lightweight, open-source scanner that specifically targets these patterns is exactly what the community has been building toward. MIT licensed, 24 commits in its first day.

S

AI Security

Shannon

Autonomous AI pentester that proves exploits, not just finds them

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

Shannon is an autonomous AI security testing agent that does what most scanners can't: it actually proves vulnerabilities are real before reporting them. Built by Keygraph, it analyzes your source code and API endpoints, identifies attack surfaces, and then autonomously executes live exploits — SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, authentication bypasses, and more. The key differentiator is evidence-first reporting: Shannon won't flag a potential SQL injection unless it can demonstrate the exploit working in your environment. Under the hood, Shannon uses Claude to reason about code structure and attack chains, combining static analysis with dynamic exploitation in a feedback loop. It maps the application graph, selects attack strategies based on code patterns, attempts the exploit, and reports only confirmed vulnerabilities with full reproduction steps. It runs locally and can be pointed at any web app or API. The timing is pointed: AI coding assistants are shipping code faster than teams can review it for security. Shannon was born from that gap — an AI to check the work of other AIs. At ~$40-55 in API credits per full scan, it's priced for startups who can't afford a dedicated security team but can't afford a breach either. The AGPL open-source release makes it accessible to indie developers and security researchers.

Decision
QSAG-Core
Shannon
Panel verdict
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Open Source
Open Source (AGPL) / ~$40-55 per scan in API costs
Best for
Open-source security scanner purpose-built for AI agent systems and MCP deployments
Autonomous AI pentester that proves exploits, not just finds them
Category
Security
AI Security

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

I've been manually reviewing MCP tool schemas before deploying them — QSAG-Core automates that. 26 MCP poisoning patterns and 28 prompt injection patterns in a single pip install is a no-brainer to add to any agent pipeline's security layer.

80/100 · ship

This solves a real problem I face constantly: AI-generated code shipping faster than security reviews can keep up. Shannon catches what static linters miss because it actually runs the exploit — that's a fundamentally different class of tool. At ~$50 per scan it's cheaper than one hour of a security consultant's time.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

Pattern matching is a starting point, not a solution. Sophisticated prompt injection and MCP poisoning attacks are designed specifically to evade signature-based detection. QSAG-Core will catch known-bad patterns, but a determined attacker will trivially bypass it. This is necessary but not sufficient security.

45/100 · skip

Every 'autonomous pentester' of the past decade has promised to replace human red teamers and delivered glorified CVE scanners. The AGPL license is also a poison pill for enterprise teams who need commercial contracts before running anything against production. Wait for a version with a proper SaaS tier and audit trail.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

Every major software ecosystem eventually got linters, scanners, and static analysis tools. QSAG-Core is the beginning of that toolchain for AI agents. The OWASP Agentic AI threat model it implements will become the industry baseline. Early adopters of agent-specific security tooling will be ahead of the curve when regulations arrive.

80/100 · ship

We're entering an era where AI writes code and AI breaks code — Shannon is the first credible entry in the adversarial AI category for developers. The agentic loop of analyze-exploit-verify is the right architecture. This becomes infrastructure-grade once it integrates into CI/CD pipelines as a mandatory gate.

Creator
80/100 · ship

Non-technical teams building AI-powered tools with MCP have no idea what tool poisoning even is. QSAG-Core gives developers a way to add a meaningful security layer that they can explain to stakeholders without a security engineering background.

80/100 · ship

As someone who builds web tools and can't afford a dedicated security team, Shannon feels like a genuine safety net. The output is human-readable with full reproduction steps — not a wall of CVE numbers I have to decode. Exactly what indie builders need.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later