AI tool comparison
QSAG-Core vs Shannon
Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.
Security
QSAG-Core
Open-source security scanner purpose-built for AI agent systems and MCP deployments
75%
Panel ship
—
Community
Paid
Entry
QSAG-Core is a Python security scanner specifically designed for the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026 threat model. It provides three core detection capabilities: MCP tool poisoning (26 malicious patterns across 7 categories), prompt injection (28+ attack patterns including goal hijacking, jailbreak attempts, and memory poisoning), and ghost agent detection for unauthorized API key usage. It runs as pure pattern matching — no ML, no cloud dependency — and can be integrated as a pre-execution guard in any Python-based agent pipeline. Released April 10, 2026 by the Neoxyber team, QSAG-Core fills a real operational gap as MCP-based agent deployments proliferate. While Microsoft's Agent Governance Toolkit addresses similar territory, it's heavyweight and enterprise-focused. QSAG-Core is a pip install and a few lines of code — the security-focused indie alternative that fits into a CI/CD pipeline or an existing agent framework without an enterprise contract. The threat model it addresses is timely. As MCP becomes the de facto standard for tool-calling in AI agents, malicious MCP servers and prompt injection via tool outputs are becoming documented attack vectors. Having a lightweight, open-source scanner that specifically targets these patterns is exactly what the community has been building toward. MIT licensed, 24 commits in its first day.
Security
Shannon
Autonomous AI that finds your vulnerabilities and exploits them — for you
75%
Panel ship
—
Community
Free
Entry
Shannon is an autonomous AI security research agent from Keygraph that takes a target (web app, API, or codebase) and runs a full offensive security workflow: static analysis, attack surface mapping across OWASP Top 10, and then actual proof-of-concept exploit execution — all without manual intervention. It orchestrates real security tools (Nmap, Subfinder, SQLMap, Playwright) under the hood, not just generating reports. The Lite tier (AGPL-3.0) handles web apps and API endpoints, running browser automation and fuzzing attacks autonomously. Shannon Pro (commercial) adds SAST/SCA integration, CI/CD pipeline hooks for PR scanning, and team-level finding management. The model layer is pluggable — defaults to GPT-4o for planning with Claude Sonnet for exploit reasoning, but can be pointed at local models. What sets Shannon apart from tools like Burp Suite or ZAP is the agentic loop: it doesn't just surface a list of potential issues, it attempts exploitation and logs what worked. For small security teams and solo founders doing pre-launch security checks, this compresses days of pentesting work into a single automated run. The open-source Lite tier is the real news here — genuine autonomous exploitation capability, freely available.
Reviewer scorecard
“I've been manually reviewing MCP tool schemas before deploying them — QSAG-Core automates that. 26 MCP poisoning patterns and 28 prompt injection patterns in a single pip install is a no-brainer to add to any agent pipeline's security layer.”
“I've been paying $400/month for a pentesting retainer for pre-launch checks. Shannon Lite ran against my staging environment and surfaced an actual SQLi vulnerability in 20 minutes that my last manual audit missed. The AGPL license means I can self-host it in my CI pipeline without worrying about data leaving my network.”
“Pattern matching is a starting point, not a solution. Sophisticated prompt injection and MCP poisoning attacks are designed specifically to evade signature-based detection. QSAG-Core will catch known-bad patterns, but a determined attacker will trivially bypass it. This is necessary but not sufficient security.”
“Autonomous exploitation tools have serious dual-use liability. The AGPL license doesn't prevent anyone from running Shannon against systems they don't own — and AI-generated PoC exploits at this speed are a real threat multiplier for less-sophisticated attackers. I'd want to see proper authorization checks and rate limiting baked into the Lite tier before recommending this broadly.”
“Every major software ecosystem eventually got linters, scanners, and static analysis tools. QSAG-Core is the beginning of that toolchain for AI agents. The OWASP Agentic AI threat model it implements will become the industry baseline. Early adopters of agent-specific security tooling will be ahead of the curve when regulations arrive.”
“Security tooling is going through the same shift coding did with Copilot — autonomous agents are going to make pentesting accessible to every small team that currently can't afford it. Shannon is an early version of what eventually becomes a background daemon watching your entire attack surface 24/7.”
“Non-technical teams building AI-powered tools with MCP have no idea what tool poisoning even is. QSAG-Core gives developers a way to add a meaningful security layer that they can explain to stakeholders without a security engineering background.”
“Less relevant to my workflow directly, but I've started including 'ran Shannon against my portfolio site' in client pitches as a trust signal. The fact that indie creators can now point a professional-grade security tool at their own work without a $5K budget is a shift worth noting.”
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next comparison in your inbox
New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.