Compare/Stash vs Together AI

AI tool comparison

Stash vs Together AI

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

S

Infrastructure

Stash

Open-source memory layer that teaches AI agents to remember and learn

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

Stash is an open-source persistent memory infrastructure for AI agents built on PostgreSQL and pgvector. Unlike retrieval-augmented generation, which searches static documents, Stash actively learns from agent experience — consolidating raw observations into facts, relationships, causal links, and higher-order patterns over time. The system exposes 28 MCP tools covering the full cognitive stack: episode storage, fact synthesis, entity graph management, goal tracking, failure pattern recognition, and self-correction when contradictions emerge. It deploys via Docker Compose in three steps and works with any OpenAI-compatible API — Claude, GPT, local models via Ollama. Hierarchical namespaces let agents keep user facts separate from project facts separate from self-knowledge. This fills a real gap in the agent ecosystem. Most agent frameworks treat each session as stateless, which means agents repeat the same mistakes and lose hard-won context. Stash gives agents a persistent cognitive layer that compounds. It surfaced on Hacker News this week to notable developer interest and is worth watching as MCP adoption accelerates.

T

Infrastructure

Together AI

Fast inference for open-source LLMs at low cost

Ship

100%

Panel ship

Community

Paid

Entry

Together AI provides fast, cheap inference for open-source models like Llama, Mistral, and DeepSeek. Features dedicated endpoints, fine-tuning, and a serverless API. Known for competitive pricing and low latency.

Decision
Stash
Together AI
Panel verdict
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Ship · 3 ship / 0 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Open Source
Pay-as-you-go (from $0.10/M tokens)
Best for
Open-source memory layer that teaches AI agents to remember and learn
Fast inference for open-source LLMs at low cost
Category
Infrastructure
Infrastructure

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
80/100 · ship

The 28 MCP tools are the right abstraction level — my Claude Desktop agents can now actually remember what I've told them across sessions without me writing my own memory layer. The Docker Compose setup is clean and the pgvector backend is production-ready.

80/100 · ship

Cheapest way to run Llama and Mistral models in production. The inference speed is competitive with major providers. OpenAI-compatible API makes switching easy.

Skeptic
45/100 · skip

The consolidation pipeline sounds elegant in theory but in practice you're letting an LLM synthesize 'causal links' and 'higher-order patterns' from raw observations. That's a recipe for hallucinated beliefs that compound over time. I'd want rigorous testing before trusting this in any production agent.

80/100 · ship

The pricing is genuinely good and reliability has improved. The fine-tuning workflow is straightforward. A solid choice for open-source model deployment.

Futurist
80/100 · ship

Persistent memory is the missing piece between 'AI assistant' and 'AI colleague.' Stash's self-correction and failure pattern recognition are early implementations of what agents will need to become genuinely reliable over long time horizons.

80/100 · ship

Together is betting that the future is open-source models. As Llama and Mistral improve, inference providers like Together become the AWS of AI.

Creator
80/100 · ship

Finally an agent that remembers my brand guidelines, tone preferences, and past feedback without me repeating myself every session. The namespace hierarchy means I can have separate memories for different clients.

No panel take

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later