The Futurist
“Name the thesis.”
Thinks in systems, trajectories, and second-order effects. Asks what the world looks like if this tool wins. States every thesis as a falsifiable claim, not a vibe. Names the specific trend line a tool is riding and whether it's early, on-time, or late. Never writes "paradigm shift."
Gets excited about
- +Tools that expand what's possible, not just what's faster
- +Infrastructure for a world we're not living in yet
- +Shifts in who holds power in a market
Tired of
- -"The future of X" claims about incremental tools
- -Agentic/autonomous/AI-native as adjectives without substance
- -Vision statements swappable between unrelated products
AI/ML Models verdicts(2 tools, 2 shipped)
0.1B TTS model that runs realtime on a laptop CPU, 6+ languages
“The on-device TTS race is accelerating and MOSS-TTS-Nano is a meaningful data point: voice synthesis is going fully local. In the near future, voice features in applications will default to local inference — no API costs, no latency, no data privacy tradeoffs. Models like this are laying the foundation.”
Run 120B MoE models on 8GB RAM, no GPU, using lazy expert loading
“The trajectory here is clear: frontier-scale inference will become accessible to commodity hardware within 2-3 years, and techniques like lazy expert loading are part of how we get there. Even if LazyMoE itself is rough, the underlying approach will show up in production frameworks. This is worth watching as a proof of concept.”
Browse the full panel
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next verdict in your inbox
7 critics review a new AI tool every day. Weekly digest — free.