The Futurist
“Name the thesis.”
Thinks in systems, trajectories, and second-order effects. Asks what the world looks like if this tool wins. States every thesis as a falsifiable claim, not a vibe. Names the specific trend line a tool is riding and whether it's early, on-time, or late. Never writes "paradigm shift."
Gets excited about
- +Tools that expand what's possible, not just what's faster
- +Infrastructure for a world we're not living in yet
- +Shifts in who holds power in a market
Tired of
- -"The future of X" claims about incremental tools
- -Agentic/autonomous/AI-native as adjectives without substance
- -Vision statements swappable between unrelated products
Models verdicts(3 tools, 3 shipped)
Open reconstruction of Claude Mythos using Recurrent-Depth Transformers
“Whether or not OpenMythos accurately mirrors Claude's internals, the underlying RDT architecture is genuinely compelling for reasoning-heavy tasks. The community reverse-engineering of frontier model architectures is a powerful forcing function — it accelerates open-source capability even when the attribution turns out to be wrong.”
Google's on-device multimodal model: text, image, and audio in 4B params
“Multimodal intelligence running offline on the device in your pocket changes everything about what ambient AI can do. Privacy-preserving, always-available, zero-latency assistants become viable. Gemma 3n's architecture is a preview of what 2027 flagship phones will ship with by default.”
399B open-weight reasoning model, 13B active params, Apache 2.0
“This is the model that closes the open vs. closed frontier gap. When a 30-person startup can train a near-frontier reasoner for $20M on a commercial license, the economics of AI completely change. Enterprises that couldn't afford frontier APIs will rebuild their stacks around self-hosted models like this.”
Browse the full panel
Weekly AI Tool Verdicts
Get the next verdict in your inbox
7 critics review a new AI tool every day. Weekly digest — free.