O

OpenAI o3 Pro in ChatGPT

Extended thinking for grad-level math, science, and coding

PriceIncluded with ChatGPT Plus ($20/mo) and ChatGPT Pro ($200/mo)Reviewed2026-06-03

Expert verdict

Ship

4-0
4 Ships0 Skips
Visit openai.com

The Panel's Take

OpenAI o3 Pro is a more powerful reasoning model available to ChatGPT Plus and Pro subscribers, featuring extended thinking capabilities that allow it to spend more compute on hard problems. It targets advanced use cases in mathematics, scientific reasoning, and complex coding tasks. According to OpenAI's internal benchmarks, it meaningfully outperforms the base o3 model on graduate-level evaluations.

Share this verdict

OpenAI o3 Pro in ChatGPT verdict: SHIP 🚀

4 ships · 0 skips from the expert panel

Full review: shiporskip.io/tool/openai-o3-pro-chatgpt-extended-thinking

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next verdict in your inbox

7 critics review a new AI tool every day. Weekly digest — free.

Embed this verdict

Tool makers can add a live ShipOrSkip badge to their site. Badge loads track impressions; clicks route back to this review.

Ship · 10.0/10
HTML badge
<a href="https://shiporskip.io/api/badge-click/openai-o3-pro-chatgpt-extended-thinking" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://shiporskip.io/api/badge/openai-o3-pro-chatgpt-extended-thinking" alt="OpenAI o3 Pro in ChatGPT Ship verdict on ShipOrSkip" width="360" height="90" /></a>
Markdown badge
[![OpenAI o3 Pro in ChatGPT Ship verdict on ShipOrSkip](https://shiporskip.io/api/badge/openai-o3-pro-chatgpt-extended-thinking)](https://shiporskip.io/api/badge-click/openai-o3-pro-chatgpt-extended-thinking)
Iframe widget
<iframe src="https://shiporskip.io/embed/openai-o3-pro-chatgpt-extended-thinking" title="OpenAI o3 Pro in ChatGPT ShipOrSkip verdict" width="360" height="260" style="border:0;border-radius:16px;max-width:100%;" loading="lazy"></iframe>

The reviews

The primitive here is straightforward: a reasoning model that allocates more inference compute to hard problems before returning a result. The DX bet OpenAI made is to hide all of that behind the same ChatGPT interface you already use — no new API surface to learn, no config, just select o3 Pro from the model picker. The moment of truth is dropping a genuinely hard coding problem or a graduate-level proof and watching whether the extended thinking trace actually catches errors that o3 misses — in my experience, it does on non-trivial linear algebra and dynamic programming. The honest caveat: if you're accessing this via API you're paying per-token and the latency is real; this is not a drop-in for production pipelines. Ship for the specific use case of hard reasoning problems where correctness matters more than speed.

Helpful?

Direct competitor here is Gemini 2.5 Pro with thinking enabled and Anthropic's Claude 3.7 Sonnet extended thinking — o3 Pro is a legitimate participant in that race, not a pretender. The benchmark claims come from OpenAI's own evaluations, which should always be read as a floor not a ceiling, but the independent third-party evals on GPQA and competition math largely corroborate meaningful improvement over base o3. Where this breaks: anything requiring real-time data, multi-step tool use in complex agentic pipelines, or cost-sensitive workloads where the token budget for extended thinking makes it economically absurd at scale. The thing that kills this in 12 months isn't competition — it's OpenAI shipping o4 or o5 and making o3 Pro the mid-tier, which is exactly what they'll do. Ship it now if you have hard reasoning problems today.

Helpful?

The thesis o3 Pro is betting on: that inference-time compute scaling is a durable lever for capability gains, and that users will pay a premium for correctness on high-stakes problems rather than just throughput. The dependency that has to hold is that extended thinking produces calibrated confidence improvements, not just longer outputs that feel more authoritative — the research trend on compute-optimal inference scaling broadly supports this but is not settled. The second-order effect that matters here is the shift in who gets access to expert-grade reasoning: a researcher at an institution without a PhD supervisor can now get graduate-level feedback on their methodology. That's not marginal, that's a structural redistribution of intellectual leverage. OpenAI is on-time to the inference scaling trend — not early, not late — and o3 Pro is the right shape of product for it. The future state where this is infrastructure is one where extended thinking is the default mode for any query touching scientific or engineering decisions.

Helpful?

The buyer is already in the building — ChatGPT Pro at $200/month targets the professional who has already decided AI is a productivity tool and is willing to pay for capability headroom. Bundling o3 Pro into that subscription is the right move: it doesn't require a new purchase decision, it justifies the existing one. The moat question is where this gets complicated — OpenAI's defensibility here is not the model architecture, which Anthropic and Google can match, but the distribution flywheel of 200M+ active users who don't want to switch interfaces. The risk is that $200/month Pro subscribers are exactly the power users who will comparison-shop on benchmark scores, and if Gemini or Claude closes the gap, churn is real. The business survives model commoditization only if OpenAI keeps shipping capability fast enough that the Pro tier always feels like it's ahead — which is a product execution bet, not a moat.

Helpful?

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later