Compare/Adobe Firefly vs trellis-mac

AI tool comparison

Adobe Firefly vs trellis-mac

Which one should you ship with? Here is the side-by-side panel verdict, pricing read, reviewer split, and community vote comparison.

A

Design & Creative

Adobe Firefly

Creative generative AI from Adobe

Ship

67%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

Adobe Firefly generates images trained only on licensed content, making it commercially safe. Integrated into Photoshop, Illustrator, and other Creative Cloud apps.

T

Creative Tools

trellis-mac

Run Microsoft's image-to-3D model natively on Apple Silicon — no NVIDIA needed

Ship

75%

Panel ship

Community

Free

Entry

trellis-mac is a community port of Microsoft's TRELLIS.2 image-to-3D model that runs entirely on Apple Silicon via PyTorch MPS — no NVIDIA GPU required. A single photo goes in, a 400,000-vertex mesh comes out in roughly 3.5 minutes on an M4 Pro, with no cloud dependencies. TRELLIS.2 is one of the strongest open-weights models for single-image 3D reconstruction, producing mesh quality that previously required either expensive NVIDIA hardware or cloud API calls. This port handles the MPS-specific tensor quirks and memory management that make running the model locally on Apple hardware nontrivial. The HN Show HN thread hit 84 points and generated active testing discussion, with multiple users confirming it runs as advertised on M1 Max and M2 Ultra hardware. For 3D artists, indie game developers, and VR/AR creators, the ability to generate production-quality meshes from reference photos on a MacBook is a meaningful workflow unlock. The bottleneck shifts from hardware access to the quality of your reference photography.

Decision
Adobe Firefly
trellis-mac
Panel verdict
Ship · 2 ship / 1 skip
Ship · 3 ship / 1 skip
Community
No community votes yet
No community votes yet
Pricing
Free tier, included in Creative Cloud
Free / Open Source
Best for
Creative generative AI from Adobe
Run Microsoft's image-to-3D model natively on Apple Silicon — no NVIDIA needed
Category
Design & Creative
Creative Tools

Reviewer scorecard

Builder
45/100 · skip

Limited API access. It's a feature within Adobe products, not a standalone developer tool.

80/100 · ship

Solid port work — handling MPS tensor compatibility for a model this complex isn't trivial. The 3.5-minute generation time on M4 Pro is competitive and the 400K vertex output is actually usable for game assets without heavy retopology.

Creator
80/100 · ship

Commercially safe training data is huge for professional work. Generative Fill in Photoshop is genuinely magical.

80/100 · ship

As a 3D artist, being able to photo-scan real objects on my Mac without a render farm or API is a genuine workflow breakthrough. The mesh quality from TRELLIS.2 is good enough to use as a base for sculpting and texturing.

Skeptic
80/100 · ship

The only AI image generator you can use commercially without IP risk. That alone makes it essential for businesses.

45/100 · skip

The original TRELLIS.2 still runs faster and with higher fidelity on a dedicated NVIDIA GPU. 3.5 minutes is fine for experimentation but too slow for iterative production workflows. Also, single-image 3D reconstruction still has consistency issues with complex objects.

Futurist
No panel take
80/100 · ship

This is Apple Silicon democratization in action. The fact that state-of-the-art 3D generation now runs on laptop hardware means 3D assets will be generated ad-hoc at every creative workflow stage within two years.

Weekly AI Tool Verdicts

Get the next comparison in your inbox

New AI tools ship daily. We compare them before you waste an afternoon.

Bookmarks

Loading bookmarks...

No bookmarks yet

Bookmark tools to save them for later